TY - JOUR T1 - Does a complex intervention targeting communities, health facilities and district health managers increase the utilisation of community-based child health services? A before and after study in intervention and comparison areas of Ethiopia JF - BMJ Open Y1 - 2020 A1 - Berhanu, Della A1 - Okwaraji, Yemisrach Behailu A1 - Defar, Atkure A1 - Bekele, Abebe A1 - Ephrem Tekle Lemango A1 - Medhanyie, Araya Abrha A1 - Wordofa, Muluemebet Abera A1 - Yitayal, Mezgebu A1 - W/Gebriel, Fitsum A1 - Desta, Alem A1 - Gebregizabher, Fisseha Ashebir A1 - Daka, Dawit Wolde A1 - Hunduma, Alemayehu A1 - Beyene, Habtamu A1 - Getahun, Tigist A1 - Getachew, Theodros A1 - Woldemariam, Amare Tariku A1 - Wolassa, Desta A1 - Persson, Lars Åke A1 - Schellenberg, Joanna AB - INTRODUCTION: Ethiopia successfully reduced mortality in children below 5 years of age during the past few decades, but the utilisation of child health services was still low. Optimising the Health Extension Programme was a 2-year intervention in 26 districts, focusing on community engagement, capacity strengthening of primary care workers and reinforcement of district accountability of child health services. We report the intervention's effectiveness on care utilisation for common childhood illnesses. METHODS: We included a representative sample of 5773 households with 2874 under-five children at baseline (December 2016 to February 2017) and 10 788 households and 5639 under-five children at endline surveys (December 2018 to February 2019) in intervention and comparison areas. Health facilities were also included. We assessed the effect of the intervention using difference-in-differences analyses. RESULTS: There were 31 intervention activities; many were one-off and implemented late. In eight districts, activities were interrupted for 4 months. Care-seeking for any illness in the 2 weeks before the survey for children aged 2-59 months at baseline was 58% (95% CI 47 to 68) in intervention and 49% (95% CI 39 to 60) in comparison areas. At end-line it was 39% (95% CI 32 to 45) in intervention and 34% (95% CI 27 to 41) in comparison areas (difference-in-differences -4 percentage points, adjusted OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.95). The intervention neither had an effect on care-seeking among sick neonates, nor on household participation in community engagement forums, supportive supervision of primary care workers, nor on indicators of district accountability for child health services. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence to suggest that the intervention increased the utilisation of care for sick children. The lack of effect could partly be attributed to the short implementation period of a complex intervention and implementation interruption. Future funding schemes should take into consideration that complex interventions that include behaviour change may need an extended implementation period. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12040912. VL - 10 IS - 9 U1 - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933966?dopt=Abstract ER -